katia boosted
katia boosted

The down side of a woman - any woman - becoming the "face" of a scientific endeavour is that hordes of internet misogynists will descend to question her contributions and expertise:
washingtonpost.com/nation/2019

katia boosted

mutual survival and cooperation > competition with no caveats. The only problem is you

katia boosted

I wish banana peels were as effective against motorised vehicles IRL as they are in Mario Kart.

katia boosted

being trans and gay is having thoughts of wow women are pretty

and then WAIT i'm woman

a thing i like about the morning sun this month is that i can see my own shadow on my walls and its honestly better than mirrors

cause i can see how hot i am without noticing every little imperfection amplified 1000x by social conditioning

i think i can weit with groceries until tomorrow

katia boosted

transmisogyny riff (+) Show more

katia boosted

transmisogyny riff (+) Show more

katia boosted
katia boosted
katia boosted
katia boosted

Tell that to anyone who tries to argue that humans don't accomplish anything unless motivated by profit.

katia boosted

And yes, astronomy in particular, shares most of the knowledge it finds freely with anyone who wants it.

All major observatories have a freely searchable database. NASA, being publicly funded, have a policy of releasing all their data into the public domain as soon as its received.

Nearly all astronomy researchers put freely accessible copies of their published work on the internet for anyone to see, at arxiv.org/archive/astro-ph

katia boosted

The thing is, astronomy research has no inherent profit in it. The work astronomers do can (and often does) eventually have a strong impact on human technology and society but, at the time the scientists are still doing it? Not really.

Astronomy research is not done for profit and frequently involves collaborations which straight up ignore national borders and political matters, focusing on acquiring knowledge and sharing it freely.

Honestly, capitalists hate it.

katia boosted

I've seen a few people complain that the black hole picture is a waste, that humanity has our environment or povery or whatever else as a far far more immediate pressing matter than to take a photo that is 'an orange smear'.

The issue at hand here isn't science funding, the issue at hand is the total structure of industrial capitalism. If you cut astronomy funding to 0, how much do you think of that would go towards social projects? How much would go towards sustainable degrowth? How much would go towards ANYTHING that goes against tje ideological principles of neoliberal capitalism.

On the contrary, there are people who find a deep romantic wonder and an inherent artistic value in things like this. People finding wonder in the world, being humbled by the nature and otherness of it is a beautiful way to look at the world. Don't light your torches at astronomy, capitalism is your issue

Show more
Queer Party!

A silly instance of Mastodon for queer folk and non-queer folk alike. Let's be friends!
Note for folks coming from Tumblr; NSFW content is allowed here, but you must tag your posts as NSFW, and provide a clear content warning for them! NSFW profile pictures or banners, or explicit usernames/display names are not allowed. Please keep it friendly!